The contract determines the code quality.
Author:Sambath Kumar Natarajan(Connect)Version:1.0
Fixed Bid vs Capacity
The biggest lie in software is "Fixed Price, Fixed Scope, Fixed Time, High Quality." Pick three (actually, pick two).
The Fixed Bid Trap
Client: "I want to pay $100k for this app." Vendor: "Okay." Reality:
- Halfway through, the requirements change.
- Vendor runs out of budget.
- Result: The vendor cuts corners. They stop writing tests. They use copy-paste code. They assign junior devs.
- End State: You get feature-complete garbage that is unmaintainable.
The Capacity Model (T&M)
Client: "I will pay for a team of 5 experts." Vendor: "Okay." Reality:
- Incentives align. The team wants to keep the client happy to keep the contract.
- Quality remains high because they have to live with the code next month.
- Risk: The client must perform Strong Product Management to ensure the team isn't just burning cash.
Contract Strategy
| Factor | Weight | Score | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope Clarity | 5 | 2 | If vague, DO NOT perform Fixed Bid. |
| Trust Level | 4 | 4 | Capacity requires trusting the partner. |
| Budget Hard Cap | 5 | 5 | If you only have $50k, Fixed Bid is your only option (but expect technical debt). |
